Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Future consideration
Categories Social Program Management Platform
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 9, 2016

RELATED IDEAS

Need OOTB configurations dealing with how effective date and received date are used, for program alignment

Be able to configure effective date and receive date on evidence. On CoC, the latter of effective and received date determines the timeline for evidence change for an evidence attribute. Clients need to be able to determine whether received date should impact the attribute value timeline or not, preferably on a program-by-program basis (e.g. Private programs use received date, public programs use effective dates).

Customer Name Minnesota
  • Attach files
  • Sigitas Jakucionis
    Reply
    |     Sep 10, 2021

    In HCR, public programs (Streamlined MA) utilize effective date for determining the start of eligibility whereas private programs (APTC/UQHP) utilize received date as they do not grant retroactive eligibility. The OOTB configuration only allows for one of the two dates to be utilized by rules while the program rules require the configuration to be at the program level.

  • Sigitas Jakucionis
    Reply
    |     Jul 13, 2016

    There are 2 PMRs for this issue:
    93392,122,000 & 09034,122,000.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Jul 8, 2016

    We are currently analyzing the requirement and will provide another update when that analysis is complete to confirm whether or not the enhancement will be considered in a future functional release.

    John Sweeney
    Offering Manager - Curam Social Programs

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     May 16, 2016

    This is one of the top priority requests by Minnesota Eligibility Technology System (METS).

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Feb 29, 2016

    Hi Kelly,

    Thank you for submitting this RFE. We have tracked down the original enhancement request submitted via pmr and can confirm that our response on that pmr, that this is a valid enhancement request under consideration for a future release, is still valid.
    Please monitor the status of this RFE for progress on the enhancement.

    Thanks,
    Claire

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Feb 22, 2016

    Hi Kelly,
    Thank you for your recently submitted enhancement request. We are currently in the process of validating the enhancement and will respond to you with a further update as soon as we have one.

    Thanks,
    Claire McLoughlin