Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Not under consideration
Categories Social Program Management Platform
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 9, 2016

RELATED IDEAS

Program Alignment / Adverse Action - OOTB does not differentiate between public and private programs

Service teams would benefit tremendously from making eligibility logic surrounding adverse actions more configurable. Depending on the shift between programs, and categories within programs, a given PDCs decision may be extended for a certain period of time beyond what would be indicated by evidence. Currently, all of the logic is handled by static methods with little documentation, making customization risky.

Adverse action logic deals with extension of eligibility based on losing eligibility for a program/coverage category; this is different from program alignment because this requirement is a result of an eligibility determination, whereas RFE 83752 is input into eligibility determinations.

  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Jun 8, 2017

    We understand how the proposed enhancement could be beneficial to you as part of a Cúram based solution. However, there is insufficient current and anticipated demand for this feature, therefore it will not be addressed in the foreseeable future, it is for this reason that we are rejecting your request.

    Your request may be resubmitted for consideration after 12 months from the date of decline.

    Thank you for your interest in the Cúram product.
    Sherry Byerly, Cúram SPM Offering Management team
    You can find more information on the RFE process here.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Jul 8, 2016

    We are currently analyzing the requirement and will provide another update when that analysis is complete to confirm whether or not the enhancement will be considered in a future functional release.

    John Sweeney
    Offering Manager - Curam Social Programs