Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 337

Introduce Support for Database as a Service

Our Cloud Native Roadmap (which has been externalised has always looked at introducing support for Database as a service. The reality is in a Cloud Native landscape, there is a push or a stere to move away from VM's where possible. In technical pr...
CLAIRE MCGAFFEY almost 2 years ago in  3 Future consideration

Support for CMIS1.1 within SPM for CMIS Integration...

One of our clients are using a CMS solution for integrating SPM with Doc and Records Management. Currently, the CMS solution team has confirmed that they will not certify Content Server against CMIS 1.0. The client will therefore require Cúram to ...
Shankar Sreedhara almost 2 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 3 Future consideration

Support Open Authorization 2.0 (OAuth 2.0) for RESTful APIs

In order to support the Canadian Federal Government Digital Standards mandate, ESDC would like to raise the following enhancement request. Support Open Authorization 2.0 (OAuth 2.0) for RESTful APIs The Directive on Service and Digital - Appendix ...
Nigel Barriscale about 2 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 5 Future consideration

Curam modeled REST API class we need a way to read headers

We have REST APIs to expose to other webapplications. Most of them are GET, where we fetch resources from Curam SPM to the calling application/interfaces. As part of the request we expect a unique key (GUID) to be passed in request header by them ...
Benoit Tremblay about 2 years ago in Income Support 3 Future consideration

Upgrade Axis2 to 1.8.0 to support Java 8

Currently, Curam Social Program Management 8.0 uses Axis2 version 1.6.2. This causes runtime exceptions when a Curam workflow calls a server Java class compiled in Java 8 or later: Workflow:RUN_ID_INVALID_PROCESS_DEFINITION: The workflow process d...
Application Delivery about 2 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Future consideration

Enhanced Print for SPM and Child Welfare

The use-case … Extracting data, person, case, plans, notes, visits, relationship, evidence and related cases etc for the purpose of disclosure to first nations orgs, legal entities, point-in-time arching and more. The feature… Something aligned to...
Nick Cronshaw about 2 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 7 Future consideration

Implement ability to configure XML-server security on WAS on z/OS

With Curam 8 the Curam XML server has new functionality for secure communication with TLS. The documentation ( https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/spm/8.0.1?topic=server-securing-xml ) explains how to configure this feature. Our servertype is Websphere Ap...
Siemon Kamstra about 2 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Future consideration

UA Responsive : IEG field validations do not highlight or display against the question unlike mandatory questions

Issue description: IBM Support Case: WH00012279 Presently, It is difficult to use IEG form validations which are dependent on previous question, i.e. these are conditional mandatory. Proposed Enhancement:To highlight the validations against the qu...
Nimesh Sultania about 2 years ago in Universal Access 2 Future consideration

Person Search Screen in v8 loses ability to see results without scrolling down

AFter upgrading to v8 or v801, the OOTB person search screen is harder to use. In v7, the text box titles were inline, effectively the page looked like it had 4 columns. in v8, the title is above the boxes, meaning that the rest of the content is ...
Garry Heap over 2 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 4 Future consideration

Automated workflow starting with Application Submission and ending with Client getting paid with no human intervention (most cases) or minimal human intervention (remaining cases)

For our social assistance system, more than 50% of the applications are for existing clients, some are duplicates, and the remaining for new clients. The journey for application submission to checking whether client is existing or new and then mer...
Rahul Bhardwaj over 2 years ago in Universal Access 2 Future consideration