Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Delivered
Categories Evidence Broker
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 26, 2017

RELATED IDEAS

Prevent Evidence Broker from creating active CPR record for related participant's prior to evidence being accepted

CPR records should not get created until evidence is created in 'in-edit' status which is not the case currently, as it is allowing the records in the 'incoming evidence queue'(holding cell) to directly impact processing of an existing case which is negatively impacting user experience due to this current function going against design thinking principles.

Customer Name North Carolina - Dept of Health and Human Services
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Mar 30, 2020

    Hi Jase,

    We identified a documentation gap as a result of the analysis of this enhancement request.

    Creation of case participant roles is something which is separate to evidence (and therefore evidence sharing), they must exist in advance to create, view evidence on any/all views.
    CPRs, as they exist at present, are fundamental to SPM and used pervasively in application logic so not something that's really suitable for changing.

    The updated documentation can be read on the page 'Reviewing evidence on a case's incoming list' in the Knowledge Centre https://rtpdoc01.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com:9443/kc/SS8S5A_7.0.10/com.ibm.curam.content.doc/AdvancedEvidenceSharing/t_AES_insertevrecord.html

    I will now close this ticket.

    Thank you for your interest in the Cúram product.
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Nov 9, 2017

    Hi Jase,

    We acknowledge that this enhancement request has been accepted for consideration. It may not be delivered within the release currently under development and we have no short term plans to provide this enhancement. However, the theme is aligned with our current multi-year strategy and will be considered for a future release.

    IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting.

    IBM will update this request in the future.

    Thank you for your interest in the Cúram product.
    Eloise O'Riordan, Cúram SPM Offering Management team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Oct 31, 2017

    Hi Jase,

    Thank you for your enhancement request.
    We require some further analysis to determine whether or not this enhancement can be considered in a future release.
    I will provide another response when our investigation is complete.

    Thank you,
    Eloise O'Riordan, Cúram SPM Offering Management team