Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 18, 2020

Require a Hook Point for adding check before EvidenceController.discardPendingUpdate()

The State of Missouri has a requirement to limit which users may discard pending changes to certain evidence types. However, no hookpoint currently exists at the beginning of the method EvidenceController.discardPendingUpdate() to allow such a customization to be made compliantly.
A hookpoint does exist at the end of EvidenceController.discardPendingUpdate() such that EvidenceControllerHook.postDiscardPendingUpdate() is called, but performing a custom security check after the operation has completed, would incur an unacceptable level of risk. Therefore, a hookpoint similar in nature to EvidenceControllerHook.postDiscardPendingUpdate() but that is executed at the beginning of EvidenceController.discardPendingUpdate() (i.e. EvidenceControllerHook.preDiscardPendingUpdate()) is requested.

Customer Name Missouri
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 30, 2020

    Hi Maribeth,

    We acknowledge that this enhancement request has been accepted for consideration. It may not be delivered within the release currently under development however the theme is aligned with our current multi-year strategy and will be considered for a future release.

    IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting.

    IBM will update this request in the future.

    Thank you for your interest in the Cúram product.
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 19, 2020

    Hi Maribeth,

    Thank you for your enhancement request.
    We require some further analysis to determine whether or not this enhancement can be considered in a future release.
    I will provide another response when our investigation is complete.

    Thank you,
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team