Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 829 of 829

N: N Relationship between Provider and Provider member

Currently, when person is associated with multiple providers for the same period, it fails when provider member tries to login to provider portal. We need a support of N:N relationship between Provider and Provider Member. ANYC has a valid busines...
Guest about 7 years ago in Provider Management 2 Future consideration

Curam 7.0.11 and above should provide support for AWS EKS

Case Management Information and Payrolling System (CMIPS) for the State of California has been running on Curam platform for more than a decade now. CMIPS is a large and complex IT system due to the large number of recipients, providers, system en...
Sundar Narayanaswamy about 1 year ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Not under consideration

Improve Attachment Process

The NC FAST application uses the OOTB Curam Attachment functionality which transmit files via CMIS protocol to FileNet. The method of delivery in this transaction is not using a stream/buffer to submit the file. As a result memory from our applica...
Guest about 6 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Future consideration

Missing application progress bar in Responsive App (Citizen Engagement Module)

MSD have fairly long online forms that the clients need to fill in to apply for financial assistance. This is primarily because MSD's online forms asks the clients to fill in the details according to their circumstances and then determine the type...
Manuraj Kannanth almost 5 years ago in Universal Access 4 Future consideration

Service Delivery to support change in Provider

This enhancement request stems from the PMR 82760,124,672, as advised by PD/Support. We are using Curam Outcome Planning along with CPM from SPM 6.2 to manage the clients care plans. OOTB, the system expects that once a service has been approved o...
Guest over 7 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Not under consideration

Show Rate Table name in rules editor

The rules editor uses the rate table code name and does not display the description. That makes confirming the rate table in use for a rule very difficult.
Guest over 6 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 3 Not under consideration

Admin screens need Search capabilities

For many Admin screens (at least the 3 I have attached), there is no search by name!?!?!? That's embarrassing and inexplicable to an audience when demoing the software. You have to troll through some entire list - sometimes it's sorted, sometimes ...
Guest almost 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 5 Future consideration

Hook Point to Programmatically Interact with a V8 Component within UIM

There is a difference between how drop downs manage their state between V7 and V8. In V7, there was no concept of a select 'state', so when a value was returned - it assumed selection. However, Carbon is subtly different, as Carbon manages state a...
Gary Parker over 2 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 3 Future consideration

Product Delivery Case not Generating when All Members are Found Ineligible

Currently, OOTB Curam does not generate a Product Delivery Case when all members are found ineligible on an Integrated Case. The South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (SCDHHS) needs to be able to generate a Product Delivery Case w...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Income Support for Medical Assistance 6 Not under consideration

Support for Push Notification CE functionality

Currently in CE, the only way to retrieve data from the backend/SPM is through two methods, both of which are not server-initiated: A user-initiated action, which will invoke a REST operation that returns data to the user. CE-side polling, whereby...
Guest over 1 year ago in Universal Access 2 Future consideration