Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 837

Service Authorization organization/search in the Outcome Plan

Currently all Service Authorizations for a case are stored within the Activities Tab in the Outcome Plan. This is beginning to add up and it is increasing loading times, as well as making it challenging to identify the service one might be looking...
Amber Ortman almost 7 years ago in Outcome Management 3 Not under consideration

Additional hook point needed to customize OnlineSecurityImplementation.checkParticipantSecurity

https://www-01.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=swg1PO02157 was provided to give a hook point, but it is only called once if caching is enabled (as it should be for performance). We need a more flexible hook point as part of checkParticipantSecu...
Garry Heap over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 5 Future consideration

Release Note items to include impact of the issues

From support case: WH00010614 This is more of a feedback about the structure and information provided in release note items. Our testers highlighted an issue where they saw duplicated dates on calendar widget, see attached screenshot for April 5th...
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 4 Not under consideration

Customization of Validate Cover Period in Manual Payment.

SPM Manual Payments - In an Active Product Delivery Case(PDC), When Manual Payments are made valid cover period validation needs to be modified as the financial cycles is modified for certain benefits and custom validation was needed to recommend ...
Srinivasan Subramanian over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 7 Not under consideration

Support metadata based creation and population of staging tables with Eligibility related Information

The product should provide a facility to markup information used in BLOB/CLOB fields such as used in the eligibility determination (for example, a new annotation type in eligibility / display rules) for reporting usage. Based on the marked up elem...
Guest almost 7 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Future consideration

Contact Log confusion about date on contact log narrative

This date can be misinterpreted by the reader as being the day that the contact occurred with the participants. A suggestion is that the word Created display before the word On to allow for more clarity to this date. Worker Abc Created On or Worke...
Amber Ortman almost 7 years ago in Child Welfare 2 Future consideration

Intake start date incorrect on Person Page

The Intake start date on the person page is the date the Intake is created in the application. We are requesting an enhancement that the start date that is selected in the New Intake would be displayed on the Person page. Refer to PMR 20236999649
Amber Ortman about 7 years ago in Child Welfare 2 Not under consideration

SDM Safety Assessment Print PDF Reports do not meet CFS needs

The Safety assessment print PDF reports do not meet CFS & CRC requirements. Please review PMR 89370 999 649. We have reviewed each assessment, and attempted to obtain consistency across all assessments. There are situations where the conversio...
Amber Ortman about 7 years ago in Structured Decision Making for Child Welfare 3 Future consideration

Provide the ability for the bulk reassignment of providers (change owner and supervisor)

Currently there is no way to reassign providers assigned to users in bulk. The supervisor has to go to each provider separately and change ownership on an individual basis which is time consuming, cumbersome and not user friendly. A user might hav...
Eloise O'Riordan about 7 years ago in Provider Management 3 Future consideration

Physically delete Notes/Attachements

The business would like a way to physically delete records in the database, not just a soft delete (setting the status to cancel). A couple places this would be useful would be on notes and attachments. This would be for instances when there are p...
Guest about 7 years ago in Outcome Management 2 Future consideration