Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Status Not under consideration
Created by Garry Heap
Created on Feb 15, 2020

Provide easier extension of Address and associated classes

Adding a single attribute to the Address entity requires numerous extensions to BPOs/structs

Customer Name Scottish Government
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 6, 2020

    Hi Garry,

    Thanks for your reply, I will now close this RFE.

    Best Regards,
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team

  • Garry Heap
    Reply
    |
    Apr 6, 2020

    Apologies, that DevWorks article is known to me and should have been checked before raising this RFE, the RFE was raised in error along with the block of others. PLease close, we will verify if this approach works for us, thanks

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 3, 2020

    Hi Garry,

    We previously documented via a DevWorks article how customers can customize the address format to support customer's address requirements. The DevWorks article I believe has moved but we will try to get it republished again. In the meantime, I am attaching it to thi ticket for reference.
    This describes the approach that can be used to provide a customized address format in a compliant manner, therefore I don't believe there is anything further we need to provide to support this.
    If however there is some reason the documented approach can't be used, please provide more information as to why.

    Thank you,
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 3, 2020

    Attachment (Description)

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 17, 2020

    Hi Garry,

    Thank you for your enhancement request.
    We require some further analysis to determine whether or not this enhancement can be considered in a future release.
    I will provide another response when our investigation is complete.

    Thank you,
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team