Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 21, 2016

When case assigned to org object the system creates notifications for all the org unit members leading to performance issues

When a case is assigned to an organizational object (say Org Unit) which has many members, the system creates notifications for all the org unit members leading to performance issues.

We need to identify a solution to handle notifications when the case owner is an organizational object. We discussed few approaches on how this could be handled in OOTB which could be considered during detailed analysis of this enhancement ticket.

+Approach 1+* - Introduce an application property that allows customers to define the maximum number of users that can receive a notification if a notification is going to get created for multiple users, and once that limit is hit no further notifications will be created. This does imply that the system will arbitrarily pick a sub-set of users to send the notification to; however, we felt that this was a more flexible approach than not creating any notifications at all if the maximum number of users is exceeded. Customers could in effect configure the system to not create any notifications in this scenario by setting the maximum number of users to 0.
+Approach 2+* - Enhance the Case Ownership area. Given the issue could potentially arise for any case ownership strategy other than direct user ownership, when ownership is assigned to anything other than a user we could have new section available that would allow the user to specify how notifications should be handled for that case. For example, this could be where they nominate one specific user or they could have other options on a drop down that might say "No notifications required for this case" or "Select subset of the owners" or if there's a lead user configured that might allow an option available for the user to select "Notify lead user".... (We can come up with other options also).
We might still need to have parameters that set upper limits, to safeguard for performance, just in case ownership is set using the API and therefore bypass this new element of the UI. However at least providing this gives control to the customer in terms of who gets notified.

Customer Name Ontario - Ministry of Community and Social Services
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 6, 2016

    Hi,

    We acknowledge that this is a valid enhancement request. It will be considered for inclusion in a future release of the product. Thank you for your interest in the Cúram product.

    Thanks,
    Eloise O'Riordan, Cúram SPM Offering Management team