Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Status Delivered
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 6, 2020

State has customized the class AddressDataIntakeApplicationListener non-compliantly to support their business

Details about the issue

Detailed description of the issue

State of missouri have customized the class AddressDataIntakeApplicationListener non-compliantly to support their business needs in the following methods preMapDataToCuram(), createTempAddressLinkEntity(), createResidentialAddressEntity()


Detailed steps to reproduce the issue in an out-of-the-box environment

N/A


If the issue cannot be replicated in an out-of-box environment, describe the detailed steps that are necessary to help emulate the customized environment in order to highlight the underlying out-of-the-box issue

N/A

Details of any on-site investigations that have been done

N/A

Description of any workarounds / potential solutions that are being used

MO have previously worked around this issue by non-compliantly customizing the OOTB listener class - AddressDataIntakeApplicationListener and customized the following methods

1. preMapDataToCuram() - MO customized this to ensure that this method is executed for HPE and HCR applications.

isTaxReturnCurrentIncome and isESIncomecurrent attributes were not defined for HPE applications. As this method is executed for HPE and HCR, MO added a filter to set these attributes only for HCR in application entity.

For Each person entity, Records are inserted into address table by fetching the data from mailingAddress. MO added the same logic for TempAddressLinkMailing, tempAddressLinksTransient and empAddressLinksFFMHome entities along with mailingAddress.

2. createTempAddressLinkEntity() - while creating the child entity TempAddressLink, MO added setTypedAttribute() method for it's custom attribute - 'addressVerificationStatus' in this entity.

MO creates a custom child entity 'TempAddressLinkMailing' along with the OOTB entity - 'TempAddressLink'.

3. getAddressData()-

MO customized the logic to store stree1 and street2 values as addressLine1 and addressLine2 in AddressFieldDetails struct instead of using addressLine2 and addressLine3 [OOTB]

MO used a default string if the street1 value is empty
Mo used mocounty which is another attribute for county and added a custom logic for this attribute.



configreport.zip file created by running the Cúram configreport Ant target.

N/A

================================================================================

Details about the Impact of the Issue

Describe the business impact of the issue on the end user

the State of Missouri's requirements cannot be compliantly implemented resulting in a maintenance burden due to non-compliant implementation.


When was the issue first identified?

N/A

How often does the issue occur?

Anytime Applications are submitted on intake process

Does the issue affect all users?

Yes

================================================================================

Environment

Exact version of IBM Curam

v7.0.7

Type of environment

OOTB

Does this appear to be a regression?

No

Has the issue been replicated in another environment?

N/A

Details of any customizations that have been made in the affected area

N/A

Customer Name Missouri
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 17, 2021

    Hi Maribeth,
    We are pleased to inform you that your enhancement request has been delivered in the new release of IBM Social Program Management, version 8.0.0.

    For more information please review the 8.0.0 Release Note ‘WorkItem:271005 - Expose AddressDataIntakeApplicationListener as an external and implementable class to facilitate compliant customization’ at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6471277.

    Thank you for taking the time to share your ideas with us. We are now closing this request as delivered.

    Regards,
    Shane McFadden, SPM Offering Management team
    You can find more information on the request process here.
    Note: we are currently in the process of improving your RFE experience and will soon transition to an Ideas Portal provided by our trusted business partner Aha!
    Further communications with additional details will be shared shortly.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 5, 2021

    Hi Maribeth,
    We are pleased to inform you that your enhancement request is included in our upcoming release of IBM Social Program Management, version 8.0.0.0.

    Thank you for taking the time to share your ideas with us. We are committed to involving our users in building our product roadmap and appreciate your suggestions.

    Regards,
    Shane McFadden, SPM Offering Management team
    You can find more information on the request process here.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 12, 2020

    Hi Maribeth,

    We acknowledge that this enhancement request has been accepted for consideration. It may not be delivered within the release currently under development however the theme is aligned with our current multi-year strategy and will be considered for a future release.

    IBM may consider and evaluate any RFE Community feedback for this request through activities such as voting.

    IBM will update this request in the future.

    Thank you for your interest in the Cúram product.
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 7, 2020

    Hi Maribeth,

    Thank you for your enhancement request.
    We require some further analysis to determine whether or not this enhancement can be considered in a future release.
    I will provide another response when our investigation is complete.

    Thank you,
    Shane McFadden, Cúram SPM Product Management team