Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 21, 2016

Asynchronous processing is not independent of the online functionality

Description: Need to make asynchronous processing independent of the online functionality so that the asynchronous processing related activities/extra heavy load etc. do not impact online functionality and vice-versa.

We are looking to see if their is a C�ram supported way of keeping some JVMs only for online usage and some JVMs (may be in a different cluster) only for asychronous/deferred processing. The intent is to isolate the impact of heavy asychronous processing on use of online functions.

Customer Name Minnesota
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 20, 2021

    Hi Abirami ,

    As part of our efforts to be transparent about our intentions with each enhancement suggestion, the offering team has initiated an annual process to carefully review the list of open enhancements.
    As agreed through the account manager for Minnesota, we are closing this RFE as it was confirmed that it is no longer required.

    We acknowledge the benefit of your suggested enhancement and although we will not take any further action at this time your suggestion will be available in our ideas repository for future consideration.

    We value your feedback and thank you for allowing us the privilege of partnering with you in developing our products.

    Regards,
    Shane McFadden, SPM Offering Management team
    You can find more information on the request process here.
    Note: we are currently in the process of improving your RFE experience and will soon transition to an Ideas Portal provided by our trusted business partner Aha!
    Further communications with additional details will be shared shortly.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 5, 2016

    Hi,

    We acknowledge that this is a valid enhancement request. It will be considered for inclusion in a future release of the product. Thank you for your interest in the Cúram product.

    Thanks,
    Eloise O'Riordan, Cúram SPM Offering Management team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 3, 2016

    Hi Abirami,

    Thank you for your enhancement request. We require some further analysis to determine whether or not it can be considered in a future release. I will provide another response when this investigation is complete.

    Thanks again,
    Eloise O'Riordan, Cúram SPM Offering Management team