Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 829 of 829

Ineligibility Info on the Caseworker View not stored and displayed

In C�ram denials functionality, a gap was identified that impacts all FFM states around not being able to view the ineligibility determination on the caseworker view. This relates to the scenario where an entire household is deemed ineligible for ...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Not under consideration

Cannot clone/copy existing evidences to reduce data entry for caseworkers

We need to be able to clone an existing evidence if the same evidence information needs to be captured for a participant in future instead of manually entering the evidence information. An example of where cloning would be helpful for the customer...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Not under consideration

Page name is not added as the first parameter when a redirect to ResolvePage.do is invoked

The customer requires that where a redirect to ResolvePage.do is invoked (for the purposes of re-directing again to a page player page). That i) page=X is supplied as a parameter ii) That page=X is supplied as the first parameter. The PMR states t...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Not under consideration

Inconsistency whereby an SSN verification is not available online, however is available on case mgt

SSN should be validated using the SSA composite service when an SSN is supplied by an individual. For the straight to shopping flow, we currently have an inconsistency whereby an SSN verification is not available online, however is available on ca...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Income Support for Medical Assistance 2 Future consideration

Require more specific error message reporting for custom exception handling during file upload

The customer reported the following issue: Custom exception handling during file upload: The current exception handling method just throws a generic exception for any error return by file management system which is CMSINFRASTRUCTURE.ERR_GENERIC_CM...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 1 Future consideration

Label for "Capture Agency Decision" is not reconciled

In the Prospective Adoptive Family feature, the user has the ability to capture the agency's decision regarding the appropriateness of an adoptive resource to adopt a child(ren). This decision will inform the list available when completing a place...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 1 Future consideration

Require integration of Person Level Verifications with Case Level Business Processes

Currently, verifications set at a Person level do not impact/integrate with any case level verifications in any way. For example, you could have an outstanding mandatory verification at Person level and this would not in any way impact the ability...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Not under consideration

Participant and Case Security (Secure Client) needs are not handled by the OOTB functionality

This is an enhancement request against the base C�ram application so some of the customer's business security needs can be handled by the OOTB functionality. The customer's current systems allow them to secure client records and specify who has ac...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 1 Future consideration

Cannot include users' username as search parameter on user search pages in Administration Manager

The customer integrates with LDAP and have requested the ability to be able to search by a user's username. We should include this as a search parameter on admin user searches (note I don't think this should be the case on user searches outside of...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 1 Future consideration

Require support for Printable Case File

Currently it isn't possible to get a printout of the contents of a case file. Functionlity should be added to CEF in support of this. As part of the analysis of this case, it will be necessary to determine what are the generic aspects of this func...
Guest almost 8 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 1 Future consideration