Skip to Main Content
Merative Ideas Portal

Shape the future of Merative!

We invite you to shape the future of Merative, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the Merative team to refine your idea

Help Merative prioritize your ideas and requests

The Merative team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at Merative works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at Merative, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Merative External Privacy Statement: https://www.merative.com/privacy

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 837

CLIENT has a requirement where during authentication of USER, they don't want to check for PasswordExpiryDate

The State of Missouri has a requirement where during authentication of USER, they don't want to check for PasswordExpiryDate ,PasswordChangedEveryday or checking if user have permissions based on particular day like Monday, Tuesday etc.They need t...
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Future consideration

The text and date fields were improperly wrapped to a second line for all the fields on the "ViewAll" milestones page.

The text and date fields were improperly wrapped to a second line for all the fields on the "ViewAll" milestones page.
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 3 Is a defect

Client used Replace_superclass on Address to remove the OOTB validations ERR_PDC_ENABLED_INVOCATION_NOT_ALLOWED

Client used Replace_superclass on Address to remove the OOTB validations ERR_PDC_ENABLED_INVOCATION_NOT_ALLOWED on premodify(), premodifyAddress(), premodifyAddressDetails() methods and replaced ERR_ADDRESS_XFV_ADDRESS_LINE1_LINE2 with a custom va...
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 4 Not under consideration

State of Missouri have a requirement to customize method UserProvidedVerificationItemKey newUserProvidedVerificationItem

Detailed description of the issue Client has a requirement to customize method UserProvidedVerificationItemKey newUserProvidedVerificationItem(NewUserProvidedVerificationItemDetails details) to meet the state requirements. It uses Replace Supercla...
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 16 Future consideration

Deleting primary address does not update preferredInd attribute on Dynamic Evidence Addresses data

Deleting primary address does not update preferredInd attribute on Dynamic Evidence Addresses data (DynamicEvidenceDataAttribute) entity. PMR WH00010826
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 4 Not under consideration

Ambiguity of address validation messages in Register Person, Employer, and other concern role types.

When there are multiple address clusters, the validation message needs to be explicit to indicate if it is for the Private address/Registered Address section or Mailing address/Business Address section. The error message for 'Street 1' is not indi...
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 2 Future consideration

CLIENT has a requirement to add the rules for custom MO prior quarter program

CLIENT has a requirement to add the rules for custom MO prior quarter program Hence customized 'convertTimeLineAttributeToElement' method for attributes named 'eligiblePrograms' and 'householdSizes' However, no hookpoint exists to allow such a cus...
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 8 Not under consideration

Evidence is not being read into the rules/decisions and Incorrect start date for coverage when person added to a case

1) Problem: Evidence is not being read into the rules/decisions Impact: possible incorrect coverage Resolution: The rules were unable to read future dated evidence into the rules when the received date and start date were not the exact same date. ...
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 3 Not under consideration

CLIENT has a requirement to have an access to Motivation for the transaction type of BATCH or DEFERRED process when program u

CLIENT has a requirement to have an access to Motivation for the transaction type of BATCH or DEFERRED process when program user is SYSTEM.However,currently there is no compliant way exists for class HealthCareSecurityExtensionStrategyHelperImpl t...
Guest over 4 years ago in Income Support for Medical Assistance 3 Future consideration

ThE client has a requirement to submit a new custom Application Case type called 'Presumptive Eligibility (PE) MHN Applicatio

The State of Missouri has a requirement to submit a new custom Application Case type called 'Presumptive Eligibility (PE) MHN Application Case.In order to validate it at the time of Authorization, crossEntityValidate() method incuram.commonintake....
Guest over 4 years ago in Social Program Management Platform 10 Not under consideration